<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mitch McConnell Drafts Casey Anthony Into the War on Terror</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/2011/07/11/mitch-mcconnell-drafts-casey-anthony-into-the-war-on-terror/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/2011/07/11/mitch-mcconnell-drafts-casey-anthony-into-the-war-on-terror/</link>
	<description>Human Rights First builds respect for human rights and the rule of law to help ensure the dignity to which everyone is entitled and to stem intolerance, tyranny, and violence.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/2011/07/11/mitch-mcconnell-drafts-casey-anthony-into-the-war-on-terror/#comment-17174</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/?p=13336#comment-17174</guid>
		<description>While we&#039;re on the subject of justification related to the war on terror cause, when the US released its new official counterterrorism strategy a couple of weeks ago, it included an objective to attack violence-supporting ideologies.  It may sound nice at first, but after taking into account how good the typical person is at telling ideologies apart, I can see it in one of several ways:

Either it includes all NATO-supporting heads of state among those that the policy opposes,

or, it throws concepts like self-defense and forgiveness out the window,

or, nobody took into account that attacking ideologies is one of the all-time great ways to incite violence,

or, someone in the government is strongly opposed to American professional football.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we&#8217;re on the subject of justification related to the war on terror cause, when the US released its new official counterterrorism strategy a couple of weeks ago, it included an objective to attack violence-supporting ideologies.  It may sound nice at first, but after taking into account how good the typical person is at telling ideologies apart, I can see it in one of several ways:</p>
<p>Either it includes all NATO-supporting heads of state among those that the policy opposes,</p>
<p>or, it throws concepts like self-defense and forgiveness out the window,</p>
<p>or, nobody took into account that attacking ideologies is one of the all-time great ways to incite violence,</p>
<p>or, someone in the government is strongly opposed to American professional football.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
