http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/2011/07/20/combating-religious-intolerance-what-works/ Human Rights First builds respect for human rights and the rule of law to help ensure the dignity to which everyone is entitled and to stem intolerance, tyranny, and violence. Fri, 24 May 2013 21:17:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/2011/07/20/combating-religious-intolerance-what-works/#comment-186793 Bob Nordberg Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:44:00 +0000 http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/?p=13513#comment-186793 Forbs is right,,,, Forbs is right,,,,

]]> http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/2011/07/20/combating-religious-intolerance-what-works/#comment-178777 Brenda Tue, 25 Sep 2012 20:59:57 +0000 http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/?p=13513#comment-178777 Asserting one's right to free speech is NOT discrimination! People have been persecuting Christians for decades and are still doing it! What would you call putting a crucifix in a jar of urine...?? They call it ART, not discrimination!! Sharia Law will NEVER be accepted in the United States! Asserting one’s right to free speech is NOT discrimination! People have been persecuting Christians for decades and are still doing it! What would you call putting a crucifix in a jar of urine…?? They call it ART, not discrimination!! Sharia Law will NEVER be accepted in the United States!

]]> http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/2011/07/20/combating-religious-intolerance-what-works/#comment-177101 Tim K. Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:37:36 +0000 http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/?p=13513#comment-177101 M. Zuhdi Jasser said of this resolution that "Beginning to categorize speech as ‘incitement’ is a slippery slope that could open the floodgates for any post-tragedy analysis to indict what would otherwise be free speech absurdly as incitement in some far-fetched cause-effect analysis that would depend on proving that speech causes violence.” [source: Forbes.com] M. Zuhdi Jasser said of this resolution that “Beginning to categorize speech as ‘incitement’ is a slippery slope that could open the floodgates for any post-tragedy analysis to indict what would otherwise be free speech absurdly as incitement in some far-fetched cause-effect analysis that would depend on proving that speech causes violence.” [source: Forbes.com]

]]>