Fact Check: State Dept. Response to Crocker Cable on Iraqi Refugees
More than anything else, I have to commend Ambassador Crocker for taking a strong stance on this issue. I have been told by some of the Iraqi employees who work at the embassy in Baghdad that he is the first person to take their concerns seriously.
Later in the day, reporters questioned State Department Spokesperson Sean McCormack about the memo and the refugee program.
Below is a quick “fact check” of the spokesperson’s answers.
QUESTION: About the refugees, did you get any details on the number of refugees? Were you able to --According to BPRM, the State Department branch in charge of processing refugees, the U.S. admitted 719, not 900, as of the end of August. Various sources suggest that as of Sept 25th, the number is somewhere between 900 and 1,000.
MR. MCCORMACK: Well, since -- in this fiscal year, meaning to date, and we still have a couple more weeks, we have processed 900, I believe -- let me verify that for you -- 900. Nine hundred Iraqi refugees have been admitted to the U.S. thus far, and that's as of the end of August. And we expect to have more before end of the fiscal year, so --
QUESTION: And of those 900 refugees, how many worked for the U.S. Government?Nobody has a precise answer to this one, but Sabrina Tavernise and David Rohde did some excellent reporting on this question in the Times article “Few Iraqis Reach US Safe Havens Despite Program.”
MR. MCCORMACK: I don't have a further breakdown for you, Sue. We'll try and -- you know, as we move through here and these are rolling numbers, we're going to try to get you more of a breakdown. It's probably easiest to be able to do that at the end of the fiscal year, at some point after September 30th, to get you a full breakdown of who came in.
They found less than 5% of the cases the UN. Refugee agency had submitted to the U.S. for resettlement were Iraqis who had been working with the United States. The Times argued that closed borders and dangerous, costly travel made it impossible for many Iraqis working for us to make it to Jordan or Syria.
On this question, Crocker says:
McCormack was asked why the U.S. has yet to do what Crocker has requested, and make in country processing an option for Iraqis working for us. He said “there are real legal restrictions, legal obligations and legal considerations that come in to play when you're talking about that decision.""we have already asked the department for the authority to do in-country processing for Iraqis who work for the Embassy and are requesting refugee status. This would at least speed up the process for those Iraqis who have put themselves and their families at risk by working with us."
First, there is a clear precedent for doing in country processing of refugees. The United States has done this in many different places, including Russia and Cuba. We need to make it an option in Iraq.
Second, while it is true that there are some legal considerations that come in to play that is no excuse for inaction. The Administration has had plenty of time to make a decision. It’s time to act urgently. Too many have already lost their lives.
Finally, McCormack was asked to comment on Syria’s recent decision to require Iraqi travelers to obtain visas first.
Syria is hosting 1.5 million Iraqi refugees. The US has resettled 719. I don’t think the U.S. government is in a position to criticize them for failing to meet their obligations.MR. MCCORMACK: Yeah.
QUESTION: Do you have any reaction to the Syrian Government's decision to delay until after Ramadan the requirement for Iraqis to have visas? Or were you aware of that?
MR. MCCORMACK: That they -- I had not heard that. I knew that they had imposed a new visa requirement on Iraqi citizens and that's -- that raised real questions about whether or not they were meeting their obligations under international law.
