UN High Commissioner Guterres assesses Iraqi refugee crisis
Last week, UN High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres ended a week-long trip to Syria, Jordan, and Iraq to asses the situation of millions of Iraqi refugees in the region. One of the issues Guterres discussed with the Iraqi government was a proposed joint assessment of conditions required for the voluntary, safe, and sustainable return of refugees. Several days later, the BBC intimated that Guterres believed that safe returns would soon be possible in an article with the unfortunate headline "UN hints at Iraq refugee returns.”
The UN refugee agency has consistenly and unequivocally stated that they do not believe that conditions currently exist for voluntary, safe, and sustainable returns. According to the UN standard, returning refugees should be confident of their legal safety (non-discrimination and freedom of fear from persecution), physical safety, and material security.
It is also absolutely key that returns are voluntary—the free choice of the refugees. To understand whether a return is voluntary, the UN has to evaluate whether the primary reason for return is improvements in the situation in the refugee’s country of origin, or push factors in the refugee’s country of asylum. For Iraqis living in Syria, Jordan, and Egypt, we know that the push factors—economic desperation, lack of access to work, education, and health care, lack of legal status—are very strong.
In the coming year, more refugees may be pushed to return to Iraq involuntarily, because they cannot survive in Syria, Jordan, or Egypt. Other Iraqis may decide to take their chances and go back for personal reasons, voluntarily but before the UN refugee agency believes that the conditions, broadly, are safe and secure. In this situation, the UNHCR has the responsibility to facilitate the decisions of individuals who choose to go home, and to work with the Iraqi government to protect and support the returnees. This cannot be interpreted more broadly as a statement on the security situation inside Iraq, much less an affirmative promotion of returns.
The UN refugee agency has consistenly and unequivocally stated that they do not believe that conditions currently exist for voluntary, safe, and sustainable returns. According to the UN standard, returning refugees should be confident of their legal safety (non-discrimination and freedom of fear from persecution), physical safety, and material security.
It is also absolutely key that returns are voluntary—the free choice of the refugees. To understand whether a return is voluntary, the UN has to evaluate whether the primary reason for return is improvements in the situation in the refugee’s country of origin, or push factors in the refugee’s country of asylum. For Iraqis living in Syria, Jordan, and Egypt, we know that the push factors—economic desperation, lack of access to work, education, and health care, lack of legal status—are very strong.
In the coming year, more refugees may be pushed to return to Iraq involuntarily, because they cannot survive in Syria, Jordan, or Egypt. Other Iraqis may decide to take their chances and go back for personal reasons, voluntarily but before the UN refugee agency believes that the conditions, broadly, are safe and secure. In this situation, the UNHCR has the responsibility to facilitate the decisions of individuals who choose to go home, and to work with the Iraqi government to protect and support the returnees. This cannot be interpreted more broadly as a statement on the security situation inside Iraq, much less an affirmative promotion of returns.
Share This Post






