
Contact HRF Communications
(212) 845 5245 media@humanrightsfirst.org
June 20, 2001
COMMITTEE CALLS FOR FAIR
TRIAL PROCEDURES AND PROTECTION FOR LAWYERS AND HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVISTS IN
CAMBODIA
“Human Rights First calls on the Cambodian Government to ensure that all defendants in
its criminal justice system have the right to a fair trial. The current trial related to the
November 2000 armed attack on Cambodian government offices illustrates how far
Cambodia has to go before it begins to meet its international obligations to
provide a fair trial and ensure progress toward the development of the rule of
law. Serious issues – such as
arrests without a warrant, restricted access to lawyers and prolonged illegal
detention are just some of the irregularities the defendants have experienced in
this trial.
Threats made to the safety
of lawyers attempting to defend their clients in this already impossible climate
are another alarming sign of the fragility of the rule of law in
Cambodia.
Human Rights First is also deeply troubled by the action of police officers on
June 20 to prevent representatives from Cambodia, Australia, Canada, Switzerland, France
and Belgium from attending a forum to discuss border disputes in
Cambodia. This attack on the fundamental
rights of freedom of expression and association, combined with the
irregularities in this trial and the threats to lawyers, sends a most ominous
signal about the Cambodian government’s attitude towards the rights of activists
and lawyers in Cambodia.”
·
Illegal
arrests:
many suspects were arrested without a warrant
·
Restricted access to
lawyers:
some of the accused never met their lawyers prior to the hearing; many others
who did meet their lawyers spent only 20 minutes with them
·
Failure to inform defendants
of charges:
during the course of the trial it became apparent that several suspects were
unaware of the nature of the charges against them
·
Prolonged illegal
detention:
contrary to Cambodian law, many suspects have been kept in pre-trial detention
for more than six months
·
Denial of the right to a
public hearing: some of the defendants’
lawyers, press, NGOs and family members were denied access to the court on the
first day and guard dogs were placed outside – intimidating many would-be
observers
·
Threats to Lawyers:
five defense lawyers were telephoned and threatened with physical harm in connection
with the case.