Egyptian Democracy Activist Saad Ibrahim
Granted Appeal
Human Rights First Welcomes Decision and Urges Swift and
Just Re-Trial
NEW YORK – Human Rights First welcomed the decision of a
Cairo appeals court today to accept the appeal by Saad Eddin Ibrahim
and his three imprisoned co-defendants. Dr. Ibrahim, the prominent
university professor and activist, was convicted on baseless, politically
motivated charges, to seven years’ imprisonment in July 2002
after an unfair trial.
Click
here to see the account of Human Rights First staff member
who was in the court today when the appeal was granted.
“We are pleased that the system worked on this occasion,”
said Neil Hicks, an expert on Egypt who has followed the Ibrahim
case since his initial arrest in June 2000. “The court was
right to uphold the procedural objections made by the defendants.
A swift judicial resolution to this matter will do much to restore
the faith of the international community in the independence of
Egypt’s judicial system.”
Human Rights First granted Ibrahim its 2002 Human Rights Award
for his work promoting human rights and democracy in Egypt. Barbara
Ibrahim, his wife, accepted the award on his behalf in October.
Human Rights First’s satisfaction is tempered by the fact
that Dr. Ibrahim has spent many months in prison, and had to endure
more than two years of criminal investigation and trial for promoting
respect for democracy and human rights in Egypt and the Middle East.
His health has deteriorated throughout this ordeal, he has suffered
a series of small strokes, and broke an ankle in a prison yard fall
in September 2002. The independent research and advocacy institute
that he led remains shuttered, and his experiences have sent an
intimidating message to others in Egypt who might consider questioning
official policy, and speaking up for unpopular causes.
“The case has been a disaster for human rights and democracy
in Egypt. Our hope now is that the re-trial will be over with swiftly,
and that Dr. Ibrahim and his co-defendants will be completely exonerated,”
added Hicks.
The case will now be tried for a third time on January 7, 2003,
with the Court of Cassation that ruled on the appeal serving as
the trial court.
|