Rwandans May Be Forced to Leave Tanzanian Refugee
Camps
As deadline for Rwandans’ repatriation looms in Tanzania,
Human Rights First urges that refugees are not forced home against
their will
Human Rights First today urged the government
of Tanzania and the UN refugee agency, the United Nations High Commissioner
for Refugees (UNHCR) to ensure that Rwandan refugees in Tanzania are
not forced to return to Rwanda against their will, without individual
assessment that they will be safe if returned.
The statement follows a Human Rights First teams’ extensive
interviews with Rwandan refugees who have arrived in Uganda from
Tanzania seeking protection in recent weeks, and discussions with
those assisting them both in Uganda and Tanzania. Though officials
with the UN and Tanzania have said that refugee returns to Rwanda
will be voluntary, refugee testimony raises serious concerns that
the December 31 deadline may force many refugees to repatriate before
their safety can be assured.
A major voluntary repatriation operation targeted at Rwandan refugees
is currently underway in Tanzania, said Deirdre Clancy, Director
of the International Refugee Program of Human Rights First. The
repatriation program was launched in November 2002 rooted in a tripartite
agreement signed in Geneva by UNHCR and the Tanzanian and Rwandan
governments. The agreement provides that every effort will be made
to complete the operation “by the end of December 2002.”
There is concern, however, that some of the estimated 25,000 to
40,000 Rwandans who were in Tanzania at the beginning of November
2002 may have been, or will be forcibly returned. The tripartite
agreement affirms that Rwandan refugees who do not wish to return
home will be permitted to remain in Tanzania, pending further review
of their cases—in line with international refugee law.
“While the talk in Geneva and Dar es Salaam has been of voluntary
repatriation there are disturbing reports that the reality on the
ground may be quite different and that refugee lives are in danger,”
said Clancy, from Kampala.
Many of the refugees who had fled from Tanzania told Human Rights First that they believed that if they stayed in Tanzania they
would have no choice but to return to Rwanda. Some alleged that
the authorities had used threats of violence and the destruction
of camp facilities to force participation in the repatriation operation.
A number claimed that they had previously attempted to repatriate
to Rwanda but had been imprisoned or otherwise persecuted there,
leading them to again flee. Some asserted that they had returned
to Rwanda as recently as November 2002 (under the new repatriation
program) but had been unable to find safety.
Many of those who talked to Human Rights First said that they
had previously been caught up in the 1996 repatriation operation—which
was marked by violence and forced many returnees to flee a second
time to Tanzania and other neighboring States. Refugees said that
public statements by Tanzanian authorities declaring that all Rwandans
must repatriate by December 31 completely eroded their sense of
safety.
As the December 31, 2002 deadline for the repatriation operation
approaches, there are genuine fears—both among refugees and
UN and voluntary agency personnel to whom Human Rights First
spoke—that inappropriate pressure will be put on Rwandans
who still need protection to leave Tanzania. “All of the parties
agreed in Geneva that that every refugee who enters the repatriation
program must do so voluntarily and be assisted to return in safety
and dignity,” said Clancy. But many Rwandans in Tanzania continue
to express credible fears of persecution if returned to Rwanda.
“It is vitally important for both the protection of the Rwandan
refugee population in Tanzania, and for the stability of the region
as a whole, that this principle of voluntary return is strictly
upheld,” she said.
Clancy added, “of course there are genuine concerns on the
part of governments that hiding among the refugee population in
Tanzania may be those who committed genocide in 1994 and who are
seeking to avoid capture and trial.” The Rwandan government
has repeatedly expressed such fears. Ensuring accountability for
serious human rights violators is not, however, incompatible with
the requirement that refugee repatriation must be voluntary, Clancy
insisted. “International law provides mechanisms whereby those
who attempt to use refugee populations as shields of impunity can
be identified and prosecuted.” A major study on security,
refugee protection, and ensuring accountability in Africa, entitled
Rebels, Refugees and the Quest for Justice, was recently published
by Human Rights First.
|