U.S. Policy on Targeted Killings Violates International Law

Drones

As the most forwardly deployed military force in the world, the United States has a strong national interest in maintaining the integrity of international law. To the extent that its targeted killing program fails to maintain—and be seen to maintain—fidelity to these rules, the United States risks not only committing war crimes, but undermining a system of rules that has protected our own military for decades.

White House senior counterterrorism advisor John Brennan has said, “I think the rule should be that if we’re going to take actions overseas that result in the deaths of people, the United States should take responsibility for that.” The administration should be doing more to make that rule a practical reality.  Human Rights First has published a blueprint for the second Obama administration, How To Ensure That the U.S. Drone Program Does Not Violate Human Rights.

Latest News

Today’s National Security Address a Step toward Transparency, Signals New Approach to Fighting Terror

Washington, D.C. – Human Rights First today welcomed President Obama’s pledge to pursue an exit strategy from the current armed conflict, to take concrete…

5-23-2013


Human Rights First: Make the Targeted Killing Policy Public

Washington, D.C. — In response to Attorney General Eric Holder’s release of a letter to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) concerning…

5-22-2013


Senate Hearing to Shed Light on Administration’s Drone Program

Washington, D.C. – Human Rights First commends the Senate Judiciary Committee’s subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights…

4-23-2013


Key Documents

Letter to President Obama on Targeted Killings

Foreign Policy Magazine: Kill the Kill List