Human Rights First builds respect for human rights and the rule of law to help ensure the dignity to which everyone is entitled and to stem intolerance, tyranny, and violence. More »
The Case of Omar Ahmed Khadr, Canada
Canadian citizen Omar Khadr was detained by U.S. forces in Afghanistan in July 2002 and transferred to Guantánamo Naval Base in October 2002. He was 15 years old when he was taken to Guantánamo and has spent more than a quarter of his life there, now in his sixth year of confinement. Khadr alleges he was repeatedly subjected to torture and cruel treatment during multiple interrogation sessions in U.S. military custody at Bagram Air Field in Afghanistan and at Guantánamo Bay.
Khadr is accused of killing a U.S. soldier with a hand grenade during combat with U.S. forces, planting mines to target U.S. convoys, and gathering surveillance at an airport in Afghanistan. He is one of two detainees at Guantánamo Bay to be charged for acts committed as a juvenile.
Khadr was designated an “enemy combatant” and an al Qaeda fighter at a Combatant Status Review Tribunal (“CSRT”) in September 2004. On April 24, 2007, the Convening Authority referred charges against Khadr for murder, attempted murder, conspiracy, providing material support for terrorism, and spying on U.S. forces in Afghanistan. But in June 2007, military commission Judge U.S. Army Colonel Peter Brownback dismissed the charges as improper because Khadr had not been designated an “unlawful enemy combatant” by the CSRT. The CSRT had found that Khadr was an “enemy combatant,” but it had not determined whether he was a “lawful” or “unlawful” combatant.
The U.S. government appealed Colonel Brownback’s decision to the Court of Military Commission Review (“CMCR”)-- a special military appeals court which was created pursuant to the 2006 Military Commissions Act. In September 2007, in its first decision ever, the CMCR held that commission judges were themselves authorized to make “unlawful enemy combatant” determinations. Following the CMCR’s decision, the military commission charges against Khadr were reinstated.
In October 2007, Khadr appealed the CMCR decision to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. The government moved to dismiss Khadr’s appeal, contending that the D.C. Circuit has no jurisdiction to hear the case until the military commission trial is completed. At the same time, Khadr asked the D.C. Circuit to delay the military commission proceedings against him until ruling on his appeal. The court rejected Khadr’s plea for delay on November 6, 2007.
Khadr was arraigned before Colonel Brownback on November 8, 2007. The question whether Khadr is an “unlawful enemy combatant” subject to the jurisdiction of the military commissions was temporarily set aside.
In January 2008, Khadr’s lawyers moved to dismiss the charges against him on several grounds, including: (1) lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (2) violation of the bill of attainder clause of the U.S. Constitution; and (3) lack of jurisdiction to try child soldiers under the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (“MCA”). The defense argued that Khadr must be tried based upon the law in 2002, when the alleged offenses occurred, and that none of the charges fall within the category of offenses historically tried by military commission.
They further contended that the MCA is an unconstitutional bill of attainder as applied to Khadr. Finally, they argued that Congress did not intend for military commissions to hear juvenile cases, and that the MCA ignores fair trial standards for juvenile offenders outlined in the Juvenile Justice Act. The government opposed the motions. A hearing on the motions was held on February 4, 2008.
In a written ruling on February 20, 2008, Colonel Brownback denied the defense motion to dismiss for violation of the bill of attainder clause. In another written ruling on May 2, 2008, Colonel Brownback denied the defense motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction to try child soldiers.
Discovery hearings were held in Khadr’s case on March 13 and April 7, 2008. The defense had filed more than 50 discovery motions, including requests for the names of all eyewitnesses to the alleged crime, any physical evidence seized from the scene of the crime, all of Khadr’s statements made during interrogation, the names of any and all interrogators and any notes taken by the interrogators, copies of any and all audio and video recordings of the interrogations, and other documents relating to the interrogation methods used on Khadr and the abuse and mistreatment of security detainees.
In another discovery hearing on May 8, 2008, the prosecution pressured Judge Brownback to set a trial date. Judge Brownback, however, ordered the government to produce DIMS (Detainee Information Management System) records, which document Khadr’s day-to-day treatment at Guantánamo, and warned that failure to produce the documents could result in an “abate[ment]” of the proceedings altogether.
On May 29, 2008, Chief Judge Marine Col. Ralph Kohlmann unexpectedly dismissed Judge Brownback from Khadr’s case, replacing him with Army Col. Patrick Parrish. Although some suspected that Judge Brownback was dismissed because of his repeated rulings against the government, Judge Kohlmann said his decision was "based on a number of manpower management considerations" unrelated to the tribunals.
In early June 2008, Khadr’s lawyers issued a press release announcing their review of a “standard operating procedure” document, turned over by the government on discovery, encouraging interrogators to destroy handwritten notes containing interrogation information. The defense argued that the document suggests that the Department of Defense destroyed evidence, as a matter of policy, to thwart its use in pending or anticipated legal proceedings.
At a pretrial hearing in June 2008, Khadr’s attorneys moved for additional discovery. Khadr’s trial was set for October 8, 2008.
In July 2008, Khadr’s lawyers released a ten-minute video showing an interrogation of Khadr by Canadian intelligence officials in Guantánamo in 2003. The video shows a distraught teen crying and pleading for his release.
Pretrial hearings continued on August 13, 2008, as Lt. Cmdr. William Kuebler, Khadr’s Pentagon-appointed lawyer, argued that his client should be given an independent psychological examination. Kuebler also argued an unlawful influence motion, claiming that the prosecution allowed other government agencies to influence the amount of information shared with the defense.
On September 4, 2008, Judge Parrish banned Air Force Brig. Gen. Thomas Hartmann from acting as the Pentagon legal advisor in Khadr’s case, citing concerns that Hartmann favored the prosecution. Kuebler said the ruling provided “token relief,” recognizing that Hartmann had already refused to fund a child psychologist that may have bolstered the defense’s case.
At a pretrial hearing on September 10, 2008, Khadr’s attorneys asked Judge Parrish to grant defense attorneys access to eyewitness descriptions of the firefight during which Khadr allegedly threw a grenade that killed a U.S. soldier. They also requested that Khadr be given a mental health examination. On September 11, Judge Parrish agreed to delay Khadr’s trial. And on September 16, 2008, Khadr’s trial was rescheduled for November 10, 2008.
Additional pretrial hearings began on October 22, 2008. Navy Lt.-Cmdr. Bill Kuebler requested an indefinite delay of Khadr’s trial, arguing that political interference had led the government to suppress evidence. Keubler also stated that the defense was given an incomplete account of Khadr’s medical records and that Khadr should be given sufficient time to develop a relationship with an independent psychologist.
On October 24, 2008, Judge Parrish agreed to delay the trial yet again. Pretrial hearings are currently scheduled to begin on January 19, 2009, with the trial set to start on January 26, 2009.
On January 12, 2009, Human Rights First, along with four other prominent human rights groups, sent a letter to President-elect Barack Obama, urging Obama to drop the military commission charges against Khadr and either repatriate him to Canada or prosecute him in U.S. federal courts.
Following a 120-day continuance at the request of the Obama Administration, pretrial hearings resumed on June 1, 2009. Khadr complained about infighting amongst his Pentagon-appointed lawyers and asked to fire them. He also rejected exercising his right to proceed pro se. Judge Parrish refused to allow Khadr’s case to proceed without any counsel and Khadr chose to retain only Navy Lt.-Cmdr. Kuebler as his attorney.
Pretrial hearings are scheduled to resume on July 15, 2009 to resolve remaining representation issues and to consider the government’s motion for an additional 120-day continuance.
A motion for continuance is scheduled for Khadr on October 7, 2009.
The following are external links: