Letter re: Immediate Procedural Steps for Fair Treatment of Asylum Seekers Wrongfully Deported to Danger in Guatemala Under the “Asylum Cooperative Agreement” Program
Dear Secretary Mayorkas, Secretary Blinken, and Attorney General Garland:
The undersigned organizations urge this administration to take prompt and concrete action to address the harm caused by the previous administration’s “Asylum Cooperative Agreement” (ACA) program.
Under that program, between November 2019 and March 2020, approximately 945 Honduran and Salvadoran asylum seekers were unlawfully deprived of their right to seek protection in the United States and instead summarily deported to Guatemala on the pretense that it is a “safe third country” where they could secure protection. In reality, Guatemala is in no way safe for asylum seekers: The country generates thousands of refugees every year and continues to suffer high levels of gang violence, as well as widespread gender-based and anti-LGBTQ violence. Migrants are especially vulnerable to these dangers, and many face persecution by gangs active across Northern Central America. Moreover, Guatemala’s nascent and structurally flawed asylum system is wholly unable to provide protection to these refugees. Indeed, not a single one of the 945 asylum seekers the United States removed to Guatemala under the ACA program has actually received asylum there. In short, as Secretary Mayorkas has rightly acknowledged, “there was nothing safe about” this purported “safe third country” deportation program. We therefore applaud this administration’s prompt notice of termination of the ACAs with Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador.
Our organizations have also welcomed this administration’s initial efforts to undo other cruel and abusive Trump administration policies that have been challenged as illegal, such as the Remain in Mexico or “Migration Protection Protocols” (MPP) program, which stranded thousands of asylum seekers in dangerous circumstances. The Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) earlier pause and recent rescission of MPP have been important steps toward closing this shameful chapter in our nation’s treatment of refugees. As this administration has recognized with MPP, ending harmful policies cannot address the harm they have already inflicted. For that reason, DHS has permitted more than 11,000 asylum seekers forcibly returned to Mexico under MPP to enter the United States to pursue claims for protection, and has now moved to expand that process. DHS has also announced “a process for accepting parole requests” from people subjected to the Trump administration’s devastating family separation policy and reportedly “stands ready to process and receive [those] families as they request to enter the U.S.”
As this administration moves ahead to address the plight of asylum seekers harmed by Trump-era policies, we urge the administration to commit to initial procedural measures to allow the small number of families and individuals deported to danger in Guatemala under the ACA program to seek protection in the United States. The stories of a few of those subjected to the ACA policy illustrate just a small measure of the suffering it inflicted:
- Josué is a gay man who fled Honduras in 2019 because of homophobic persecution by police and others. Josué sought asylum at the U.S. border, but was removed to Guatemala even after he described to DHS officers the dangers he would face as a gay man. Days after his removal to Guatemala, Josué narrowly escaped a homophobic attack. He had to flee to Mexico, where he was persecuted by Mexican law enforcement. After that, he felt he had no choice but to enter the United States without inspection.
- Isai, also a gay man, fled El Salvador after being persecuted because of his sexuality. When he passed through Guatemala, people yelled homophobic slurs at him. He sought asylum at the U.S. border and told DHS officers that he would not be safe in Guatemala, but was still removed there. Once in Guatemala, Isai tried applying for asylum but local officials told him the country is not safe for gay people. He was then escorted to the Guatemala-Mexico border and advised to live in Mexico. In Mexico, Isai suffered further abuse because of his sexuality.
- Elena and her young daughter (who is now just nine years old) fled Honduras to escape the gang who murdered her partner. Even though Elena told DHS officials that they would still be in danger if sent to Guatemala, they were removed under the ACA. After her and her daughter’s deportation to Guatemala, Elena felt unsafe and, with no support network, they had no choice but to accept transportation back to Honduras, where they lived in hiding from her partner’s killers.
The administration has thus far facilitated the return of just a few of the 945 people deported under the ACA program. It must now ensure that mechanisms are in place to permit the rest of this small number of wrongfully-deported asylum seekers to return to the United States and pursue their claims for asylum here.
We urge the administration to publicly announce and implement these concrete measures to avoid inflicting further harm on asylum seekers deported under the ACA program:
- The administration should allow affected asylum seekers to voluntarily register to request to return to the United States (if needed) and seek protection, such as via the CONECTA registration portal or other existing channels.
- The administration should not reinstate ACA expedited removal orders, and should instead rescind all ACA removal orders.
- The administration should not subject these individuals to expedited removal upon their return and should permit them to access affirmative asylum procedures.
- The administration should not detain individuals previously subjected to ACA removal, either upon their re-entry to the United States or subsequent to re-entry (whether or not they entered at a designated port of entry).
- Families should be allowed to enter together and be processed together.
Further, to permit meaningful access to asylum in the United States for all people subjected to ACA removal—wherever they are now located—the administration should also announce and implement the following measures:
- For people who have already re-entered the U.S. (whether or not at a port of entry):
- Permit them to apply for parole-in-place along with expedited employment authorization processing;
- For those not in removal proceedings, allow them to apply affirmatively for asylum, rather than initiating removal proceedings;
- For those already in removal proceedings, subject to the individuals’ approval, move to dismiss those proceedings without prejudice to allow them to first apply for asylum affirmatively.
- For people in Mexico seeking to re-enter the United States at land ports of entry:
- While the (also harmful and illegal) Title 42 order remains in place, parole these individuals into the United States via the existing Title 42 exemption processes and allow them to apply affirmatively for asylum;
- After termination of the Title 42 order, allow these individuals access to port-of-entry processing without lengthy “metering” or other delays to entry, parole them into the United States, and allow them to apply affirmatively for asylum.
- For others abroad who wish to return to the U.S. to seek protection:
- Conduct outreach in Northern Central America and Mexico, including through partnering with non-governmental and community-based organizations, to identify people removed to Guatemala under the ACA; advise those people of the below opportunities to return to the United States; and permit them to register via the CONECTA portal or a similar system in order to request to return;
- For individuals who apply for advance parole, grant advance parole on an expedited basis; facilitate their return by air by coordinating with airlines to ensure that they are able to board commercial flights, as well as by arranging air travel for those unable to afford it; and permit them to apply affirmatively for asylum following their arrival;
- For all others, provide access to interview procedures for the U.S. refugee admissions program and expedited resettlement in the United States for those who qualify as refugees, including through resettlement referrals by UNHC and through a potential Priority-2 designation of individuals removed to Guatemala under the ACA as a group of special concern.
We would welcome the opportunity to engage with the administration on these recommendations and the steps it can take to ensure the safety of asylum seekers removed to Guatemala under the ACA. We also urge the administration to address the demands for additional redress made by individuals who were illegally removed to Guatemala under the ACA and who suffered additional harm abroad because of their wrongful deportation.